{"CACHEDAT":"2026-11-12 10:45:00","HOWSUBJECTMAP":{},"SLUG":"course-format-delivery-from-bits-to-pro-vcTyvPbRxd","MARKDOWN":"# Co-Creation of the Format\n\nInspired by the Erasmus+ Blended Intensive Programme (BIP) for initial teacher education, SciLMi set out to develop a counterpart for continuing professional development, where no equivalent Erasmus+ format for sustained learning exists. Building on the Quality Standards for Courses under Key Action 1 (EC 2021) and the design elements of effective professional development (Darling-Hammond & Hyler & Gardner 2017), the SciLMi team co-designed the BIT as a European-level blended format for in-service teachers ([→ Validation & Implementation Criteria](/doc/validation-implementation-criteria-8SSOwd2R7F)). All three BITs ran variants of the same core modules on meta-scientific literacies, with each BIT reflecting a specific project priority in its focus module: critical thinking, digital media and information literacies, and inclusion.\n\n# Piloting\n\nThe BIT format was piloted in three SciLMi teacher trainings in 2025:\n\n* SciLMi Critical Thinking for Effective Democratic Citizens\n * Santiago de Compostela, Spain\n * 16–20 June 2025\n * 18 participants from 7 countries\n* SciLMi Digital Media and Information Literacies for Effective Democratic Citizens\n * Munich, Germany\n * 1–5 September 2025\n * 22 participants from 15 countries\n* SciLMi Inclusive Classrooms for Effective Democratic Citizens\n * Innsbruck, Austria\n * 3–7 November 2025\n * 22 participants from 11 countries\n\nThe BITs brought together 62 in-service teachers from 20 countries, who taught 16 different subjects, 12 to 13 in each BIT. Each BIT followed the same blended structure: a three-hour virtual kick-off four to six weeks before the five-day on-site week, preparatory tasks, and a three-hour virtual follow-up 6 to 13 weeks after the on-site week, depending on school holidays in the participating countries. The on-site weeks took place in residential training centres and comprised 28.5 hours of learning activities. After the on-site week, participants were to implement their lessons, involve colleagues in implementing a multidisciplinary sequence, and revise their lesson plans on the basis of their experience.\n\n# Additional Implementations\n\nTwo further SciLMi trainings in 2026 provided additional experience with the course modules. They were held as on-site weeks without virtual components and were not part of the BIT evaluation:\n\n* Train the Trainer\n * Athens, Greece\n * 20–24 April 2026\n * 24 teacher trainers from 14 countries\n* SciLMify Your Teaching\n * Budapest, Hungary\n * 11–15 May 2026\n * 28 teachers from 17 countries\n\n# Evaluation\n\nHÉTFA evaluated the BITs in a mixed-methods design along three dimensions: the design of the BITs, the competences they addressed, and the course experience. The evaluation combined pre-, post-, and follow-up surveys, semi-structured interviews with trainers and organisers, structured observation of the sessions, the teachers' daily feedback during the on-site weeks, and live polls during the follow-up (→ D 7.2).\n\nThe evaluation was complemented by feedback from BIT participants during the on-site weeks and at the SciLMi Hub Scale-Up Event on 28 May 2026, where teachers and teacher trainers who had taken part in SciLMify Your Teaching and Train the Trainer also commented on their experience, and by an ad hoc impact survey of all 114 participants of the five SciLMi trainings, of whom 71 responded (→ D 7.3).\n\nParticipants rated the blended format highly, and they judged it more effective than a traditional one-week on-site course, all the more so after they had implemented their lessons and completed the follow-up (→ D 7.3).\n\n# Lessons Learnt\n\nLessons learnt from each training fed directly into the next. The most important lessons concern the following aspects (→ D 7.3):\n\n* **Blended format**: Participants most often named better preparation for the on-site activities as an advantage of the blended format. The opportunity to put their learning into practice in their own classrooms and to reflect on it together afterwards became more valuable to them as they completed the course in full.\n* **Continued support**: At the SciLMi Hub Scale-Up Event, teachers who had taken part in SciLMi trainings without virtual components called most strongly for ongoing support after the on-site week, some of them in the form of sustained coaching. BIT participants, too, found the cross-subject collaboration they had experienced during the course hard to continue back at school. \n * **PRO**: The course therefore includes virtual coaching in small groups during the classroom implementation phase.\n* **Residential setting and international encounter**: After the course content, participants valued the international and intercultural experience most. The residential setting with shared meals created networks that later grew into Erasmus+ mobilities and joint projects.\n* **Cross-subject collaboration**: Participants valued and enjoyed working with colleagues from other subjects in the multidisciplinary group, and almost all of them rated cross-subject teaching as important or very important for giving students a solid education.\n* **Selection**: Unexpectedly high demand led to the development of a structured, transparent selection procedure that ensures a broad representation of subjects, countries, and levels of teaching experience.\n\n\n\n---\n\n**References**\n\n* Darling-Hammond, Linda & Hyler, Maria E. & Gardner, Madelyn. 2017. *Effective Teacher Professional Development*. Palo Alto, CA: Learning Policy Institute.\n* European Commission (EC). 2021. *Quality Standards for Courses under Key Action 1 (Learning Mobility of Individuals)*. https://erasmus-plus.ec.europa.eu/resources-and-tools/quality-standards-key-action-1.","RENDERMODE":"markdown","HTML":"
Inspired by the Erasmus+ Blended Intensive Programme (BIP) for initial teacher education, SciLMi set out to develop a counterpart for continuing professional development, where no equivalent Erasmus+ format for sustained learning exists. Building on the Quality Standards for Courses under Key Action 1 (EC 2021) and the design elements of effective professional development (Darling-Hammond & Hyler & Gardner 2017), the SciLMi team co-designed the BIT as a European-level blended format for in-service teachers (→ Validation & Implementation Criteria). All three BITs ran variants of the same core modules on meta-scientific literacies, with each BIT reflecting a specific project priority in its focus module: critical thinking, digital media and information literacies, and inclusion.
\nThe BIT format was piloted in three SciLMi teacher trainings in 2025:
\nThe BITs brought together 62 in-service teachers from 20 countries, who taught 16 different subjects, 12 to 13 in each BIT. Each BIT followed the same blended structure: a three-hour virtual kick-off four to six weeks before the five-day on-site week, preparatory tasks, and a three-hour virtual follow-up 6 to 13 weeks after the on-site week, depending on school holidays in the participating countries. The on-site weeks took place in residential training centres and comprised 28.5 hours of learning activities. After the on-site week, participants were to implement their lessons, involve colleagues in implementing a multidisciplinary sequence, and revise their lesson plans on the basis of their experience.
\nTwo further SciLMi trainings in 2026 provided additional experience with the course modules. They were held as on-site weeks without virtual components and were not part of the BIT evaluation:
\nHÉTFA evaluated the BITs in a mixed-methods design along three dimensions: the design of the BITs, the competences they addressed, and the course experience. The evaluation combined pre-, post-, and follow-up surveys, semi-structured interviews with trainers and organisers, structured observation of the sessions, the teachers' daily feedback during the on-site weeks, and live polls during the follow-up (→ D 7.2).
\nThe evaluation was complemented by feedback from BIT participants during the on-site weeks and at the SciLMi Hub Scale-Up Event on 28 May 2026, where teachers and teacher trainers who had taken part in SciLMify Your Teaching and Train the Trainer also commented on their experience, and by an ad hoc impact survey of all 114 participants of the five SciLMi trainings, of whom 71 responded (→ D 7.3).
\nParticipants rated the blended format highly, and they judged it more effective than a traditional one-week on-site course, all the more so after they had implemented their lessons and completed the follow-up (→ D 7.3).
\nLessons learnt from each training fed directly into the next. The most important lessons concern the following aspects (→ D 7.3):
\nReferences
\n