{"CACHEDAT":"2026-06-27 04:18:19","SLUG":"a-2025-learners-dimension-meta-scientific-literacies-YmsqIwYliU","MARKDOWN":"\n\n# `D1` Open up your mind\n\n## `D1G1` Recognise your own information bubble or echo chamber.\n\n\n:::tip\n### `D1G1O1` Describe the variety of information sources available today.\n\n* `D1G1O1H1` List different information sources: on paper (magazines, books, etc.) and online (search engines, social media platforms, etc.)\n* `D1G1O1H2` Categorise ☑ information sources into different types (recipients etc.)\n\n \\\n\n:::\n\n\n:::tip\n### `D1G1O2` Recognise the importance of using a variety of information sources and carefully selecting them.\n\n* `D1G1O2H1` Use information from different sources types and different sources.\n* `D1G1O2H2` Explain the influence of algorithms on search results and on social media feeds.\n * ==H5P (Elsa)==\n* `D1G1O2H3` Explain the role AI, ☑ bots and bot farms, troll farms, click farms, fake accounts, and automated campaigns play in distributing (mis)information.\n\n:::\n\n\n:::tip\n### `D1G1O3` Examine the impact of misinformation on society.\n\n* `D1G1O3H1` Recognise the possibility to fall for and (un)intentionally share misinformation.\n* `D1G1O3H2` Examine possible consequences for uninformed and misinformed individuals and societies.\n\n:::\n\n## `D1G2` Use search strategies to find (more) information sources on the socio-scientific issue.\n\n\n:::tip\n### `D1G2O1` Determine the focus (what), scope (how much), and purpose (what for) of the information need.\n\n* `D1G2O1H1` Identify the scientific issue you would like to know more about.\n* `D1G2O1H3` Break down the socio-scientific issue into key words you can use for your search.\n\n:::\n\n\n:::tip\n### `D1G2O2` Select possible information sources.\n\n* `D1G2O2H1` ☑ Selecting information sources\n\n:::\n\n\n:::tip\n### `D1G2O3` Formulate tailored search queries for the selected information sources.\n\n* `D1G2O3H1` For ☑ **search engine**, use specific keywords and quotation marks for exact phrases. Use Boolean operators. Use filters (more recent, country-specific, \"\",…).\n * ==H5P activity (Katerina)==\n* `D1G2O3H2` For ☑ **social media platforms**, use relevant hashtags, include @-mentions and handles, use keywords and search phrases, use filters. Look at engagement metrics.\n* `D1G2O3H3` For **AI**: prompts (use simple language, create specific instructions, provide context, ask follow-up questions).\n* `D1G2O3H4` For ☑ **databases** and library catalogues.\n\n:::\n\n## `D1G3` Exclude the (superficially) least relevant search results or posts in a feed on the socio-scientific issue.\n\n\n:::tip\n### `D1G3O1` Identify advertisements and sponsored content in the search engine results pages / social media feeds / AI results.\n\n* `D1G3O1H1` Identify ☑ visual indications of sponsored content.\n* `D1G3O1H2` Analyse ☑ textual cues indicating sponsored content.\n* `D1G3O1H3` Use ☑ technical tools to identify sponsored content.\n\n:::\n\n\n:::tip\n### `D1G3O2` Identify what looks like reputable information sources.\n\n* `D1G3O2H1` Identify well-known and reputable domains (.edu / .gov, etc.).\n* `D1G3O2H2` Look for established institutions (e.g. universities, journals) and well-known media outlets.\n\n:::\n\n\n:::tip\n### `D1G3O3` Exclude ~~irrelevant~~ search results / hits / posts.\n\n==H5P (Heka)==\\n==H5P Click restraint (Sylvia)==\n\n* `D1G3O3H1` Scan the titles for keywords that match your search query.\n* `D1G3O3H2` Skim the snippets for key terms related to your query.\n* `D1G3O3H3` Check the publication date.\n\n:::\n\n## `D1G4` Select the most credible information sources.\n\n\n:::tip\n### `D1G4O1` Identify primary information sources to distinguish author and messenger.\n\n* `D1G4O1H1` Identify official reports, scientific studies, research reports, direct statements from credible authorities, etc.\n* `D1G4O1H2` Identify author and messenger.\n\n:::\n\n\n:::tip\n### `D1G4O2` Evaluate the credibility of the author and/or messenger.\n\n* `D1G4O2H1` ☑ Evaluate ~~the relevance of~~ the author's and/or messenger's expertise and credentials (qualifications, professional affiliations, other words, reviews…) in the given context cross-checking in new browser tabs (lateral reading).\n * ==H5====P (Katerina)==\n* `D1G4O2H2` ☑ Use verification tools to detect deep fakes.\n\n:::\n\n\n:::tip\n### `D1G4O3` Evaluate the credibility of the website, platform or media outlet.\n\n* `D1G4O3H1` Evaluate the credibility and reputation of the website, platform or media outlet by cross-checking it in new browser tabs (lateral reading).\n * ==H====5P (Katerina)==\n* `D1G4O3H2` Analyse reviews of the website, platform or media outlet.\n* `D1G4O3H3` Verify the authenticity of displayed images and videos by using ☑ verification tools.\n\n:::\n\n\n:::tip\n### `D1G4O4` Investigate the intended recipients and/or typical users of the information source.\n\n* `D1G4O4H1` ☑ Investigate the intended audience\n\n:::\n\n## D1G5 Packaging of the information / Attention-grabbingH5P (Greek team)\n\n## D1G5 Keep your cool / Awareness triggers (Heka)\n\n==Heka's awareness triggers and meta-tags==\n\n==emotional headlines==\n\n# `D2` Click & dig deeper\n\n## `D2G1` Differentiate between fact and opinion.\n\n\n:::tip\n### `D2G1O1` Assess if the viewpoint is supported by arguments and the arguments are supported by evidence.\n\n* `D2G1O1H1` Identify verbal cues that indicate opinions or uncertainty.\n* `D2G1O1H2` Identify ☑ verbal cues that indicate arguments and evidence or examples.\n\n:::\n\n\n:::tip\n### `D2G1O2` Verify the reliability of the arguments and evidence using (domain-specific) knowledge.\n\n* `D2G1O2H1` Identify empirical evidence.\n* `D2G1O2H2` Verify if the ☑ information is supported by reliable sources and references.\n* `D2G1O2H3` Check if the information was peer-reviewed.\n* `D2G1O2H4` Use fact-checking websites, such as Snopes, [FactCheck.org](http://FactCheck.org), or PolitiFact, to see if the information has been reviewed or validated or debunked by professional fact-checkers.\n\n:::\n\n## `D2G2` Identify biased information.\n\n\n:::tip\n### `D2G2O1` Identify manipulation strategies (psychological influence, emotional appeal, social pressure, framing).\n\n* `D2G2O1H1` Examine how the information is framed.\n* `D2G2O1H2` Examine the use of rhetorical devices.\n * `First Language: 14, 15, 16: another filter label`\n * `Foreign Language (17, 18)`\n * `Subject: First Language; Age: 14, 15, 16; Another Label: whatever`\n* `D2G2O1H3` Identify sensational and emotional forms of expression (language, imagery, sound) used to influence the audience.\n* `D2G2O1H4` Check whether the messages of textual and audio-/visual or elements match by doing reverse-image searches to see if an image has been altered or taken out of context.\n * ==H5P Reverse-image search (Sylvia)==\n\n:::\n\n\n:::tip\n### `D2G2O2` Identify deceptive tactics (lying, omission, fabrication, misrepresentation).\n\n* `D2G2O2H1` Check if the information presents multiple viewpoints or if it seems one-sided.\n* `D2G2O2H2` Evaluate whether the author or ☑ messenger might have a motive, such as financial benefit, political gain, or fame, that could affect the objectivity of the information.\n* `D2G2O2H3` Consider who benefits from the information being believed or spread.\n\n:::\n\n\n:::tip\n### `D2G2O3` Consider the context in which the information was created.\n\n* `D2G2O3H1` Identify the ☑ purpose behind the information.\n* `D2G2O3H2` Consider the geographical and cultural ☑ context of the information.\n* `D2G2O3H3` Examine the political climate. Consider the political context at the time the information was created.\n\n:::\n\n## `D2G3` Analyse the logical consistency of the information.\n\n\n:::tip\n### `D2G3O1` Identify common logical fallacies.\n\n* `D2G3O1H1` ☑ Logical fallacies\n\n:::\n\n\n:::tip\n### `D2G3O2` Ensure that the information logically follows and does not contradict itself.\n\n* `D2G3O2H1` Identify key concepts.\n* `D2G3O2H2` Visualise connections between the key concepts to identify elements that don't fit well (concept maps).\n* `D2G3O2H3` Evaluate the reliability of numerical claims by assessing whether a meaningful baseline or reference point is provided.\n\n:::\n\n## `D2G4` Select the most informative and relevant pieces of information.\n\n\n:::tip\n### `D2G4O1` Critically ignore irrelevant information.\n\n* `D2G4O1H1` Recognise that your attention is a limited resource – you cannot check every claim or source in depth.\n* `D2G4O1H2` If relevance is unclear: reflect on what source/info is compelling or surprising to you.\n* `D2G4O1H3` Ignore the trivial/irrelevant and let what you found compelling/surprising guide you to what to spend more attention clicking on and checking.\n\n:::\n\n\n:::tip\n### `D2G4O2` Distinguish superficial from in-depth coverage.\n\n* `D2G4O2H1` Analyse if the content is divided into well-structured subsections or arguments, each focusing on different aspects of the topic.\n* `D2G4O2H2` Highlight arguments in orange, evidence and examples in yellow, impacts in blue, and potential solutions in green.\n* `D2G4O2H3` Check if multiple viewpoints are presented and who is quoted.\n\n:::\n\n## D2G5 Intendended recipients\n\n==H5P Identify intended recipient categories==\n\n==H5P Identify indended recipients 1==\n\n==H5P Identify intended recipient personas==\n\n# `D3` Make up your mind\n\n## `D3G1` Explore the viewpoints on the socio-scientific issue from different dimensions.\n\n\n:::tip\n### `D3G1O1` Evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of the viewpoints on the socio-scientific issue from a scientific perspective.\n\n* `D3G1O1H1` List the different viewpoints supported by evidence-based arguments.\n* `D3G1O1H2` Analyse how science on the socio-scientific issue has evolved over time.\n* `D3G1O1H3` Determine if there is consensus among the experts in the scientific community regarding the socio-scientific issue.\n* `D3G1O1H4` Evaluate the different arguments based on scientific evidence.\n\n:::\n\n## `D3G2` Explore impacts and solutions as well as the parties affected by the socio-scientific issue.\n\n\n:::tip\n### `D3G2O1` Categorise potential impacts and solutions – both positive and negative – of the socio-scientific issue.\n\n* `D3G2O1H1` Divide ☑ impacts into categories.\n* `D3G2O1H2` Divide potential science-based ☑ solutions to the socio-scientific issue into categories.\n\n:::\n\n\n:::tip\n### `D3G2O2` ==For each impact and/or potential solution==, identify the parties (groups, communities, organisations, etc.) across society affected the most – both positively and negatively.\n\n* `D3G2O2H1` Determine the parties responsible for putting solutions into practice.\n* `D3G2O2H2` Determine which parties are more susceptible to ☑ negative impacts.\n* `D3G2O2H3` Determine which ☑ parties or communities are likely to benefit.\n\n:::\n\n## `D3G3` Evaluate the trade-offs between the scientific, social and ethical dimensions.\n\n\n:::tip\n### `D3G3O1` Evaluate the trade-offs between scientific arguments, competing interests, ethical considerations, and uncertainties about future outcomes regarding the socio-scientific issue.\n\n* `D3G3O1H1` Identify impacts and solutions that benefit one group while meaning drawbacks for another.\n* `D3G3O1H2` Identify solutions that reduce negative impacts or enhance positive impacts or both.\n* `D3G3O1H3` Identify solutions that create new negative impacts.\n* `D3G3O1H4` Assess how multiple impacts and solutions might interact or compound over time.\n\n:::\n\n## `D3G4` Weigh your viewpoints against the various ~~dimensions~~ perspectives of the socio-scientific issue.\n\n\n:::tip\n### `D3G4O1` Examine your personal situation (values, emotions, ethics, desires, experiences, practicalities) in relation to the complex realities of the issue.\n\n* `D3G4O1H1` ☑ Personal relation to the SSI\n\n:::\n\n\n:::tip\n### `D3G4O2` (Re)assess your viewpoint on a socio-scientific issue.\n\n* `D3G4O2H1` ☑ (Re)Assessing personal viewpoint on SSI\n * ==H5P (Stig)==\n\n:::\n\n# `D4` Speak out and take action\n\n## `D4G1` Design a plan for your civic engagement to address the socio-scientific issue.\n\n\n:::tip\n### `D4G1O1` Identify opportunities to engage (potential WHEREs).\n\n* `D4G1O1H1` Identify the needs of yourself, your family, your friends, your school, the local community or broader society with regard to the pertinent socio-scientific issue\n* `D4G1O1H2` Identify gaps in existing efforts addressing these needs.\n* `D4G1O1H3` In your group, take our favourite measure and plan how to implement it in your school. Prepare a presentation for your classmates on how you would go about it.\n\n:::\n\n\n:::tip\n### `D4G1O2` Determine the impact you would like to make (WHY).\n\n* `D4G1O2H1` Determine the recipient(s) or target group(s) of your civic engagement (WHO).\n* `D4G1O2H2` Select the type of civic engagement you would like to take (inform, argue, take action - HOW).\n* `D4G1O2H3` Weigh the effect of potential forms of engagement.\n\n:::\n\n\n:::tip\n### `D4G1O3` Select the most appropriate communication channel(s) to disseminate your message on the pertinent socio-scientific issue and/or identify an action or initiative (WHERE).\n\n* `D4G1O3H1`☑ Communication channels\n\n:::\n\n\n:::tip\n### `D4G1O4` Prepare for potential feedback and reactions.\n\n* `D4G1O4H1` Review similar initiatives to understand common feedback and reactions.\n* `D4G1O4H2` Simulate the engagement.\n* `D4G1O4H3` Apply skills of dialogue.\n\n:::\n\n## `D4G2` Communicate established viewpoints on a socio-scientific issue: Inform.\n\n\n:::tip\n### `D4G2O1` Tailor your message to the target audience and communication channel\n\n* `D4G2O1H1` Previous knowledge\n* `D4G2O1H2` Linguistic competence\n\n:::\n\n\n:::tip\n### `D4G2O2` Report or visualise objectively the opposing viewpoints on the socio-scientific issue.\n\n* `D4G2O2H1` Organise the arguments and supporting evidence.\n* `D4G2O2H2` Be objective and concise.\n* `D4G2O2H3` Refer to sources.\n\n:::\n\n## `D4G3` Communicate your viewpoint on a socio-scientific issue: Argue.\n\n\n:::tip\n### `D4G3O1` Define your [message.]()\n\n* `D4G3O1H1` Formulate a clear statement on the socio-scientific issue in a single sentence.\n* `D4G3O1H2` Identify a hook to grab the recipients' attention\n* `D4G3O1H3` Provide background information on the socio-scientific issue.\n* `D4G3O1H4` Explain ☑ how the evidence supports the arguments and ☑ how the arguments support your message.\n\n:::\n\n\n:::tip\n### `D4G3O2` Tailor your message to the target audience regarding their previous knowledge, interests and language skills.\n\n* `D4G3O2H1` Select arguments that support your message.\n* `D4G3O2H2` Select supporting evidence for each argument\n* `D4G3O2H3` (Re)formulate your arguments using the appropriate register, style, and linguistic structure for the given context.\n\n:::\n\n\n:::tip\n### `D4G3O3` Invalidate potential counter-arguments.\n\n==H5P (Sini)==\n\n* `D4G3O3H1` Identify likely counter-arguments.\n* `D4G3O3H2` Research evidence and logic behind the counter-arguments.\n* `D4G3O3H3` Evaluate their relevance and validity.\n* `D4G3O3H4` Develop a response and prepare alternate arguments and evidence to support your message.\n\n:::\n\n\n:::tip\n### `D4G3O4` Suggest appropriate actions and initiatives based on your message.\n\n* `D4G3O4H1` ☑ Actions and initiatives to convey a message.\n\n:::\n\n## `D4G4` Take action to become a responsible democratic citizen.\n\n\n:::tip\n### `D4G4O1` Select an action or initiative.\n\n* `D4G4O1H1` Identify what you are able to do.\n\n:::\n\n\n:::tip\n### `D4G4O2` Make a plan to execute.\n\n* `D4G4O2H1` Outline steps and a timeline.\n* `D4G4O2H2` Determine success criteria\n\n:::","HTML":"
D1Open up your mindD1G1Recognise your own information bubble or echo chamber.D1G1O1Describe the variety of information sources available today.D1G1O1H1List different information sources: on paper (magazines, books, etc.) and online (search engines, social media platforms, etc.)\nD1G1O1H2Categorise ☑ information sources into different types (recipients etc.)\nD1G1O2Recognise the importance of using a variety of information sources and carefully selecting them.D1G1O2H1Use information from different sources types and different sources.\nD1G1O2H2Explain the influence of algorithms on search results and on social media feeds.\nD1G1O2H3Explain the role AI, ☑ bots and bot farms, troll farms, click farms, fake accounts, and automated campaigns play in distributing (mis)information.\nD1G1O3Examine the impact of misinformation on society.D1G1O3H1Recognise the possibility to fall for and (un)intentionally share misinformation.\nD1G1O3H2Examine possible consequences for uninformed and misinformed individuals and societies.\nD1G2Use search strategies to find (more) information sources on the socio-scientific issue.D1G2O1Determine the focus (what), scope (how much), and purpose (what for) of the information need.D1G2O1H1Identify the scientific issue you would like to know more about.\nD1G2O1H3Break down the socio-scientific issue into key words you can use for your search.\nD1G2O2Select possible information sources.D1G2O2H1☑ Selecting information sources\nD1G2O3Formulate tailored search queries for the selected information sources.D1G2O3H1For ☑ search engine, use specific keywords and quotation marks for exact phrases. Use Boolean operators. Use filters (more recent, country-specific, "",…).\nD1G2O3H2For ☑ social media platforms, use relevant hashtags, include @-mentions and handles, use keywords and search phrases, use filters. Look at engagement metrics.\nD1G2O3H3For AI: prompts (use simple language, create specific instructions, provide context, ask follow-up questions).\nD1G2O3H4For ☑ databases and library catalogues.\nD1G3Exclude the (superficially) least relevant search results or posts in a feed on the socio-scientific issue.D1G3O1Identify advertisements and sponsored content in the search engine results pages / social media feeds / AI results.D1G3O1H1Identify ☑ visual indications of sponsored content.\nD1G3O1H2Analyse ☑ textual cues indicating sponsored content.\nD1G3O1H3Use ☑ technical tools to identify sponsored content.\nD1G3O2Identify what looks like reputable information sources.D1G3O2H1Identify well-known and reputable domains (.edu / .gov, etc.).\nD1G3O2H2Look for established institutions (e.g. universities, journals) and well-known media outlets.\nD1G3O3Exclude H5P (Heka)
H5P Click restraint (Sylvia)
D1G3O3H1Scan the titles for keywords that match your search query.\nD1G3O3H2Skim the snippets for key terms related to your query.\nD1G3O3H3Check the publication date.\nD1G4Select the most credible information sources.D1G4O1Identify primary information sources to distinguish author and messenger.D1G4O1H1Identify official reports, scientific studies, research reports, direct statements from credible authorities, etc.\nD1G4O1H2Identify author and messenger.\nD1G4O2Evaluate the credibility of the author and/or messenger.D1G4O2H1☑ Evaluate D1G4O2H2☑ Use verification tools to detect deep fakes.\nD1G4O3Evaluate the credibility of the website, platform or media outlet.D1G4O3H1Evaluate the credibility and reputation of the website, platform or media outlet by cross-checking it in new browser tabs (lateral reading).\nD1G4O3H2Analyse reviews of the website, platform or media outlet.\nD1G4O3H3Verify the authenticity of displayed images and videos by using ☑ verification tools.\nD1G4O4Investigate the intended recipients and/or typical users of the information source.D1G4O4H1☑ Investigate the intended audience\nHeka's awareness triggers and meta-tags
\nemotional headlines
\nD2Click & dig deeperD2G1Differentiate between fact and opinion.D2G1O1Assess if the viewpoint is supported by arguments and the arguments are supported by evidence.D2G1O1H1Identify verbal cues that indicate opinions or uncertainty.\nD2G1O1H2Identify ☑ verbal cues that indicate arguments and evidence or examples.\nD2G1O2Verify the reliability of the arguments and evidence using (domain-specific) knowledge.D2G1O2H1Identify empirical evidence.\nD2G1O2H2Verify if the ☑ information is supported by reliable sources and references.\nD2G1O2H3Check if the information was peer-reviewed.\nD2G1O2H4Use fact-checking websites, such as Snopes, FactCheck.org, or PolitiFact, to see if the information has been reviewed or validated or debunked by professional fact-checkers.\nD2G2Identify biased information.D2G2O1Identify manipulation strategies (psychological influence, emotional appeal, social pressure, framing).D2G2O1H1Examine how the information is framed.\nD2G2O1H2Examine the use of rhetorical devices.\nFirst Language: 14, 15, 16: another filter label\nForeign Language (17, 18)\nSubject: First Language; Age: 14, 15, 16; Another Label: whatever\nD2G2O1H3Identify sensational and emotional forms of expression (language, imagery, sound) used to influence the audience.\nD2G2O1H4Check whether the messages of textual and audio-/visual or elements match by doing reverse-image searches to see if an image has been altered or taken out of context.\nD2G2O2Identify deceptive tactics (lying, omission, fabrication, misrepresentation).D2G2O2H1Check if the information presents multiple viewpoints or if it seems one-sided.\nD2G2O2H2Evaluate whether the author or ☑ messenger might have a motive, such as financial benefit, political gain, or fame, that could affect the objectivity of the information.\nD2G2O2H3Consider who benefits from the information being believed or spread.\nD2G2O3Consider the context in which the information was created.D2G2O3H1Identify the ☑ purpose behind the information.\nD2G2O3H2Consider the geographical and cultural ☑ context of the information.\nD2G2O3H3Examine the political climate. Consider the political context at the time the information was created.\nD2G3Analyse the logical consistency of the information.D2G3O1Identify common logical fallacies.D2G3O1H1☑ Logical fallacies\nD2G3O2Ensure that the information logically follows and does not contradict itself.D2G3O2H1Identify key concepts.\nD2G3O2H2Visualise connections between the key concepts to identify elements that don't fit well (concept maps).\nD2G3O2H3Evaluate the reliability of numerical claims by assessing whether a meaningful baseline or reference point is provided.\nD2G4Select the most informative and relevant pieces of information.D2G4O1Critically ignore irrelevant information.D2G4O1H1Recognise that your attention is a limited resource – you cannot check every claim or source in depth.\nD2G4O1H2If relevance is unclear: reflect on what source/info is compelling or surprising to you.\nD2G4O1H3Ignore the trivial/irrelevant and let what you found compelling/surprising guide you to what to spend more attention clicking on and checking.\nD2G4O2Distinguish superficial from in-depth coverage.D2G4O2H1Analyse if the content is divided into well-structured subsections or arguments, each focusing on different aspects of the topic.\nD2G4O2H2Highlight arguments in orange, evidence and examples in yellow, impacts in blue, and potential solutions in green.\nD2G4O2H3Check if multiple viewpoints are presented and who is quoted.\nH5P Identify intended recipient categories
\nH5P Identify indended recipients 1
\nH5P Identify intended recipient personas
\nD3Make up your mindD3G1Explore the viewpoints on the socio-scientific issue from different dimensions.D3G1O1Evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of the viewpoints on the socio-scientific issue from a scientific perspective.D3G1O1H1List the different viewpoints supported by evidence-based arguments.\nD3G1O1H2Analyse how science on the socio-scientific issue has evolved over time.\nD3G1O1H3Determine if there is consensus among the experts in the scientific community regarding the socio-scientific issue.\nD3G1O1H4Evaluate the different arguments based on scientific evidence.\nD3G2Explore impacts and solutions as well as the parties affected by the socio-scientific issue.D3G2O1Categorise potential impacts and solutions – both positive and negative – of the socio-scientific issue.D3G2O1H1Divide ☑ impacts into categories.\nD3G2O1H2Divide potential science-based ☑ solutions to the socio-scientific issue into categories.\nD3G2O2For each impact and/or potential solution, identify the parties (groups, communities, organisations, etc.) across society affected the most – both positively and negatively.D3G2O2H1Determine the parties responsible for putting solutions into practice.\nD3G2O2H2Determine which parties are more susceptible to ☑ negative impacts.\nD3G2O2H3Determine which ☑ parties or communities are likely to benefit.\nD3G3Evaluate the trade-offs between the scientific, social and ethical dimensions.D3G3O1Evaluate the trade-offs between scientific arguments, competing interests, ethical considerations, and uncertainties about future outcomes regarding the socio-scientific issue.D3G3O1H1Identify impacts and solutions that benefit one group while meaning drawbacks for another.\nD3G3O1H2Identify solutions that reduce negative impacts or enhance positive impacts or both.\nD3G3O1H3Identify solutions that create new negative impacts.\nD3G3O1H4Assess how multiple impacts and solutions might interact or compound over time.\nD3G4Weigh your viewpoints against the various D3G4O1Examine your personal situation (values, emotions, ethics, desires, experiences, practicalities) in relation to the complex realities of the issue.D3G4O1H1☑ Personal relation to the SSI\nD3G4O2(Re)assess your viewpoint on a socio-scientific issue.D3G4O2H1☑ (Re)Assessing personal viewpoint on SSI\nD4Speak out and take actionD4G1Design a plan for your civic engagement to address the socio-scientific issue.D4G1O1Identify opportunities to engage (potential WHEREs).D4G1O1H1Identify the needs of yourself, your family, your friends, your school, the local community or broader society with regard to the pertinent socio-scientific issue\nD4G1O1H2Identify gaps in existing efforts addressing these needs.\nD4G1O1H3In your group, take our favourite measure and plan how to implement it in your school. Prepare a presentation for your classmates on how you would go about it.\nD4G1O2Determine the impact you would like to make (WHY).D4G1O2H1Determine the recipient(s) or target group(s) of your civic engagement (WHO).\nD4G1O2H2Select the type of civic engagement you would like to take (inform, argue, take action - HOW).\nD4G1O2H3Weigh the effect of potential forms of engagement.\nD4G1O3Select the most appropriate communication channel(s) to disseminate your message on the pertinent socio-scientific issue and/or identify an action or initiative (WHERE).D4G1O3H1☑ Communication channels\nD4G1O4Prepare for potential feedback and reactions.D4G1O4H1Review similar initiatives to understand common feedback and reactions.\nD4G1O4H2Simulate the engagement.\nD4G1O4H3Apply skills of dialogue.\nD4G2Communicate established viewpoints on a socio-scientific issue: Inform.D4G2O1Tailor your message to the target audience and communication channelD4G2O1H1Previous knowledge\nD4G2O1H2Linguistic competence\nD4G2O2Report or visualise objectively the opposing viewpoints on the socio-scientific issue.D4G2O2H1Organise the arguments and supporting evidence.\nD4G2O2H2Be objective and concise.\nD4G2O2H3Refer to sources.\nD4G3Communicate your viewpoint on a socio-scientific issue: Argue.D4G3O1Define your [message.]()D4G3O1H1Formulate a clear statement on the socio-scientific issue in a single sentence.\nD4G3O1H2Identify a hook to grab the recipients' attention\nD4G3O1H3Provide background information on the socio-scientific issue.\nD4G3O1H4Explain ☑ how the evidence supports the arguments and ☑ how the arguments support your message.\nD4G3O2Tailor your message to the target audience regarding their previous knowledge, interests and language skills.D4G3O2H1Select arguments that support your message.\nD4G3O2H2Select supporting evidence for each argument\nD4G3O2H3(Re)formulate your arguments using the appropriate register, style, and linguistic structure for the given context.\nD4G3O3Invalidate potential counter-arguments.H5P (Sini)
\nD4G3O3H1Identify likely counter-arguments.\nD4G3O3H2Research evidence and logic behind the counter-arguments.\nD4G3O3H3Evaluate their relevance and validity.\nD4G3O3H4Develop a response and prepare alternate arguments and evidence to support your message.\nD4G3O4Suggest appropriate actions and initiatives based on your message.D4G3O4H1☑ Actions and initiatives to convey a message.\nD4G4Take action to become a responsible democratic citizen.D4G4O1Select an action or initiative.D4G4O1H1Identify what you are able to do.\nD4G4O2Make a plan to execute.D4G4O2H1Outline steps and a timeline.\nD4G4O2H2Determine success criteria\n