Arguing for the Circular Economy – Is Recycling Enough?
Misconception 1: "Recycling is enough to solve environmental problems"
Misconception 2: "Recycling is always environmentally friendly" Misconception 3: "Recycling benefits all countries equally"
Misconception 4: "Recycling encourages people to be more environmentally responsible"
Misconception 5: "All products can be easily recycled"
Lesson Plan Details:
Activity 1
Activity Instruction
Teacher writes on the board:
❓ “Is recycling enough to save the planet?”
➕ “What’s a better approach?”
Teacher explains:
“You’ll explore two different views today. By the end, you will begin to form your own argument, which we’ll develop further in the coming lessons.”
Step 1: Recall & Connect (Remember / Understand)
Learners recall what they already know about recycling and share prior experiences (e.g., school recycling bins, family habits).
Teacher prompts:
“What happens when you recycle at home or school?”
“What problems might still exist even if we recycle a lot?”
Step 2: Predict & Hypothesize (Apply / Analyze)
Learners predict answers to the board question: “Is recycling enough to save the planet?”
In pairs, they discuss and note down at least one reason for and one reason against.
They then hypothesize a possible “better approach” (without yet knowing about circular economy).
Step 3: Clarify the Learning Goal (Understand / Analyze)
Teacher states the learning goal explicitly:
“Today you will compare recycling with another approach called the circular economy. You will analyze their strengths and weaknesses, and begin to develop your own argument.”
Learners restate the learning goal in their own words with sentence frames:
“I will learn how to ___ and then I will use this to ___.”
Activity 1 (SciLMified)
Activity 2
Activity Instruction
/* Style Definitions */
table.MsoNormalTable
{mso-style-name:"Table Normal";
mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0;
mso-tstyle-colband-size:0;
mso-style-noshow:yes;
mso-style-priority:99;
mso-style-parent:"";
mso-padding-alt:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;
mso-para-margin:0cm;
mso-pagination:widow-orphan;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;
mso-ascii-font-family:Calibri;
mso-ascii-theme-font:minor-latin;
mso-hansi-font-family:Calibri;
mso-hansi-theme-font:minor-latin;
mso-bidi-font-family:"Times New Roman";
mso-bidi-theme-font:minor-bidi;
mso-font-kerning:1.0pt;
mso-ligatures:standardcontextual;
mso-fareast-language:EN-US;}
Format: Pair or small group discussion
Purpose:
/* Style Definitions */
table.MsoNormalTable
{mso-style-name:"Table Normal";
mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0;
mso-tstyle-colband-size:0;
mso-style-noshow:yes;
mso-style-priority:99;
mso-style-parent:"";
mso-padding-alt:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;
mso-para-margin:0cm;
mso-pagination:widow-orphan;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;
mso-ascii-font-family:Calibri;
mso-ascii-theme-font:minor-latin;
mso-hansi-font-family:Calibri;
mso-hansi-theme-font:minor-latin;
mso-bidi-font-family:"Times New Roman";
mso-bidi-theme-font:minor-bidi;
mso-font-kerning:1.0pt;
mso-ligatures:standardcontextual;
mso-fareast-language:EN-US;}
Encourage
critical thinking about what happens to everyday items after disposal.Raise
awareness of materials, recycling limitations, and circular economy
relevance.Stimulate vocabulary and ideas for the later writing task.
- Show 2–3 pictures on the screen, one at a time.
- For each photo, learners discuss:
·
What do
you think happens to this when it’s thrown away?
·
Can
this be recycled? Why or why not?
·
What
are the pros and cons of this material or product?
·
Could
it be reused, repaired, or redesigned instead?
-
Share
Out: Ask 2–3 pairs to share
their thoughts after each image.
- Suggested Images & Talking Prompts:
1.
Mixed-fabric clothing (e.g.,
polyester-cotton blend hoodie)
o
🔁 Can’t be easily separated = not
recyclable.
o
💬 What materials are in this? Could
you donate or repurpose it?
Other
Yes
Activity 2 (SciLMified)
Activity 3
Activity Instruction
/* Style Definitions */
table.MsoNormalTable
{mso-style-name:"Table Normal";
mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0;
mso-tstyle-colband-size:0;
mso-style-noshow:yes;
mso-style-priority:99;
mso-style-parent:"";
mso-padding-alt:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;
mso-para-margin:0cm;
mso-pagination:widow-orphan;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;
mso-ascii-font-family:Calibri;
mso-ascii-theme-font:minor-latin;
mso-hansi-font-family:Calibri;
mso-hansi-theme-font:minor-latin;
mso-bidi-font-family:"Times New Roman";
mso-bidi-theme-font:minor-bidi;
mso-font-kerning:1.0pt;
mso-ligatures:standardcontextual;
mso-fareast-language:EN-US;}
Activity 3: Source Exploration & First Reflections
🔹 Group A (Emerging learners, dyslexia, multilingual):
Use the Ellen MacArthur Foundation site with a guided worksheet.
Define: “What is a circular economy? Write a definition in your own words.”
Identify & categorize: “List at least three strategies of a circular economy besides recycling. Which ones reduce waste before it is created?”
Sentence frame: “A circular economy is better because it focuses on…”
Reflection question: “Which of these strategies do you think is the most effective? Why?”
🔹 Group B (Confident readers, advanced English):
Read simplified or original excerpt from “Recycling is not enough” (e.g., on waste trade & health issues).
Highlight: 1) a problem with recycling, 2) a global consequence.
Sentence frame: “Recycling can create global injustice because…”
Reflection question: “If someone argued that recycling is enough, how would you respond?”
➡️ Support: Learners can read in pairs or small groups. Provide text-to-speech, translation tools, and access to dictionaries. About half the learners should read each text so they can later pair up with the other group to exchange information.
Mini Argument Task (added for both groups):
In pairs, one student argues “Recycling is essential” and the other argues “Circular economy is better.” They must use at least one idea from their text as evidence.
Text; Other
Yes; Yes
Yes; Yes; Yes
Activity 3 (SciLMified)
Activity 4
Activity Instruction
/* Style Definitions */
table.MsoNormalTable
{mso-style-name:"Table Normal";
mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0;
mso-tstyle-colband-size:0;
mso-style-noshow:yes;
mso-style-priority:99;
mso-style-parent:"";
mso-padding-alt:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;
mso-para-margin:0cm;
mso-pagination:widow-orphan;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;
mso-ascii-font-family:Calibri;
mso-ascii-theme-font:minor-latin;
mso-hansi-font-family:Calibri;
mso-hansi-theme-font:minor-latin;
mso-bidi-font-family:"Times New Roman";
mso-bidi-theme-font:minor-bidi;
mso-font-kerning:1.0pt;
mso-ligatures:standardcontextual;
mso-fareast-language:EN-US;}
Step 1: Organize & Compare (Understanding / Analyzing)
Learners from Groups A and B share their findings and complete a Venn diagram to classify and differentiate Recycling vs Circular Economy.
Prompts in the organizer:
Good for…
Problems with…
Alternatives to…
Examples…
➡️ Learners identify, list, and categorize ideas.
➡️ Use icons, visuals, and color-coded phrases for differentiation.
➡️ Provide sentence starters such as:
“While recycling is important, it has limits such as…”
“In contrast, a circular economy tries to…”
Step 2: Reflect & Form Arguments (Analyzing / Evaluating)
Pair exchange: Each mixed pair formulates a short position statement to explain and justify their viewpoint.
“I believe ___ is more effective because…”
“A weakness of ___ is…”
Step 3: Prioritize & Justify (Evaluating)
Ranking task: In small groups, learners rank, prioritize, and justify the approaches (recycling, reuse, repair, circular economy) from most to least effective.
They must defend their ranking with evidence.
Step 4: Debate & Refine (Evaluating / Creating)
Whole-class debate:
Prompt: “Should society invest more in recycling or in circular economy initiatives?”
Learners present, argue, and defend their positions.
They listen to, critique, and respond to counterpoints.
Teacher pushes them to cite and apply evidence from the texts.
Final step: Learners revise and refine their arguments based on discussion.
Text; Other
Yes; Yes
Yes; Yes