1. Introduction, theoretical input

2. Briefly recap the fishing game

3. Learners can recall the rules and outcomes of the fishing game

4. Learners can identify what happened when resources were overused

5. Learners describe what happens when we overfish

Theoretical Input with worksheet

a) Learners can define what cod are (biology, habitat, role in the ecosystem).

b) Learners can summarize the causes of the collapse (e.g., overfishing, ineffective regulation, economic pressure).

c) Learners can outline the ecological and economic consequences of the collapse.

d) Learners compare the collapse graph to their own graphs from the candy game.

e) Learners can compare the cod stock collapse graph to their own candy game results, identifying patterns and parallels.

1. & 2. Reading card & personal reflection

Learners reflect on the stakeholder's viewpoint by answering: What matters to me? What actions do I support or oppose? What outcomes do I hope for?

3. & 4. Discussion in group

Learners discuss with their group which points are most relevant and which arguments are strongest. They decide together which policies to propose, support, or oppose.

5. & 6. Further development of arguments

Learners use both the information from the QR source and their prior class knowledge to develop arguments that fit their assigned role. They connect real world issues, such as sustainability, regulations, and the economy, to their stakeholder's position and justify their recommendations using evidence and stakeholder reasoning.

7. Preparation of poster and presentation

Learners design a visual poster that communicates their proposal clearly and persuasively. They also prepare to present their proposal to the rest of the class.

Part 1: Stakeholder Presentations (approx. 15 minutes)

Objective: Each group clearly communicates and justifies their position to a mock government panel.

Learners will:

1. Explain what matters most to them as a stakeholder.

2. Summarize and justify the actions they support or oppose.

3. Present their policy proposals in a persuasive way using evidence.

Part 2: Stakeholder Discussion / Government Hearing (approx. 15 minutes)

Objective: Learners engage in a structured role play discussion where they debate, analyze, and propose common solutions.

Learners will:

1. Compare different stakeholder positions.

2. Critique conflicting proposals respectfully.

3. Evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of different policies.

4. Negotiate compromises and propose a balanced, shared solution.